San Francisco

I went to San Francisco after a very long time this evening. I like to believe that I have not grown into a city sleek. (I believe it was Tolstoy who said that you can take a boy out of a village, but you can not take the village out of the boy). And I am really more at ease on a remote stretch of forest or mountain than on city streets. Cities give me the adrenaline rush, but too much of it is like living on caffeine. I then need to go sleep it off in a long trip somewhere far off to get my sanity back. But great cities are also, like caffeine or alcohal addictive. If you have been away from it for a long time and then suddently drink up, it all comes back with a vengeance.
And I have always been utterly charmed by San Francisco. When you live there, you get desensitized to its distinctive colours and smells. But last evening when I went there, I had the hightened senses of a kid. Even the mundane was magical. The majesty of the sky scrappers against the evening lights, the muni buses going past ponderously, the evening rush of commuters, the brief whiffs of perfume. It was all very prosaic, but somehow deeply satisfying.
I came back and tried to think of a great city photgrapher who saw cities through equally naive eyes. Not someone like Winogrand, whose obsession was the streets of New York city, nor a great like Ernst Haas, who saw everything through his own peculiar vision. (incidentally, I LOVE Hass’ photographs). But someone who shoots straight, but who captured the spirit of the city, its everyday charms. Someone who has photographed San Francisco. I guess there are many out there. I guess I just dont know of them.

Yet another conspiracy theory

I usually dont give much credence to conspiracy theories. Most such theories tend to be idle speculation. Nevertheless, ‘United Flight 93 Crash Theory Home Page’ seems to bring out some interesting inconsistencies in the flight 93 story that we know so well. (via Rebeccablood). I think that even if that flight actually was shot down ( it seems highly unlikely that something this big can be kept secret), under the circumstances it was fully justified.

Worldhum & travel writing

I am a sucker for good travel writing. I like reading about remote places, barren empty landscapes. I like lean chiselled prose. I love Chatwin’s writing.
For a long time it seemed that good travel writing has found a home in the webzines. Now as one web publication after another closes its doors, there is a migration of people who pioneered travel content on the web back to print or to independent zines. Sustaining good related zines seems to be as difficult on the web as it is on print.
Good part is people are still trying to give good travel writing a home on the web. Jim Benning and Michael Yessis have developed this site called World Hum. I hope it becomes popular and remains interesting. Don George, the guy who created the ‘Wonderlust’ section of Salon has moved over to Lonely Planet. There is an interesting conversation between Benning and George ‘Soul-Stretching Adventures Don’t Sell Ads’ available in the current issue of Online Journalism Review. George indicated that something similar to Wonderlust may be in the works in the online version of LonelyPlanet.

Carl Steadman

Rediscovered Carl Steadman last night. I knew of him earlier when suck.com was cool. I remember thinking WOW! after I had read his profile in Wired (it used to be available in Bangalore bookstores 2 months after publication and was obscenely expensive for a magazine). I remember wanting to come to the valley very badly and thinking its all gonna pass me by.
I had forgotten all about that excitement of working, of feeling that I am part of something new, great and revolutionary. Then last night I was reading ‘When Automatic’s Teller Ran Dry’, and it brought back the forgotten and sullied dreams of yester years. And then I read Carl’s 99secrets– a sad, beautiful, haunting nothing that is possible only on the web and it somehow, in a lopsided, weird way made me feel better about life.

My take on Enron

My take on Enron:
Scandal of course would be an understatement in describing Enron. While the corruption in Enron itself is bad enough, I have been more fascinated by Anderson’s failure to raise the alarm. To my mind, the complicity of the accounting firm is symptomatic of a systems failure that was waiting to happen.
'Lynn E. Turner, former chief accountant for the SEC and now a professor at Colorado State University, calculates that in the past half-dozen years investors have lost close to $200 billion in earnings restatements and lost market capitalization following audit failures. And the pace seems to be accelerating. Between 1997 and 2000, the number of restatements doubled, from 116 to 233.'

(Business Week in ‘Accounting in Crisis’)

The same article goes on to say:
That accountants have become increasingly dependent on consulting is clear. In 1993, 31% of the industry's fees came from consulting. By 1999, that had jumped to 51%. In 2001, for example, PricewaterhouseCoopers earned only 40% of its worldwide fees from auditing, 29% coming from management consulting and most of the rest from tax and corporate finance work..... More telling, in a study of the first 563 companies to file financials after Feb. 5, 2001, the University of Illinois' Bailey found that on average, for every dollar of audit fees, clients paid their independent accountants $2.69 for nonaudit consulting. Puget Energy (PSD ), based in Bellevue, Wash., had the greatest imbalance, paying PricewaterhouseCoopers only $534,000 for its audit, but over $17 million in consulting fees. "That's 30 years of audit fees in one year for nonaudit," points out Bailey. Marriott International Inc. ...paid Andersen just over $1 million for its audit, but more than $30 million for information technology and other services.
I suspect organizations and people who are willing to be compromised would be compromised no matter what. And even if Anderson didn’t make $27 million in consulting from Enron in 2000 (as opposed to $25 million in audit fees), the same thing might had happened. Since there is a regular procession of auditors who join their client companies, individual auditors may still be tempted to go out of their way to please clients. But without the temptation of consulting fees that encourages auditors to go out of their way to keep clients happy, organizational objectivity of auditing firms would probably not be as severely compromised. While the BW article also recommends limiting auditors move to client companies, I think that it is impractical. It is probably better to try to force a gap of 2-3 years before a consultant can move into a client company that he consulted for.
NYT in a front page story Jan 24th expressed reservation about Washington’s ability and inclination in enforcing closer supervision of accounting firms. Arthur Levitt, the former SEC chairman battled very publicly and ultimately unsuccessfully in 2000 with the industry over his proposal to limit consulting by auditing firms.
Let us pray that the momentum of the Enron scandal ensures at least some much needed reforms.
While I am on the subject of consulting: I also feel that one of the reasons technology consulting companies are trusted so much less by their clients is because tech consulting is badly compromised by their alliance partnerships. There are very few consulting companies that doesnt pitch (subtly or directly) products in which they have a vested interest to their clients. It has now come to a stage where many good product company will not look to ally itself with a technology consulting company if it does not bring in business to the product company. In many case, it would need to commit sizeable revenue to the product company to be accepted as a partner. As a result, most consulting companies today are becoming more hustler than consultants. Most of the clients who went for the big-buck e-business roduct implementations in the last few years simply did not need to go into that kind of expenses to achieve what they needed. They allowed themselves to be steered them towards the big ticket items by the consultants. The chicken is now coming home to roost.

O’Reilly weblogs

I was surfing through O’Reilly Network’s Weblogs . Its a cool place, but it is mildly exasperating for people who are not familiar with the O’Reilly Network. You would thing that O’Reilly would know enough about information navigation to have some kind of a directory. There actually isnt any good directory or search engine for weblogs out there. But the number and size of Weblogs in O’Reilly is managable enough for them to be able to categorize them properly.
Anyway, Gordon Mohr’s weblog has the scoop on what is happening on Kazaa – the P2P file sharing software. Gordon is the CTO of Bitzi – a similar company that apparently ‘identifies, describes, and discovers files of all types’. Sounded a little like a Microsoft web services pitch to me, but the site looks interesting. Would spend some time exploring it this weekend. I also ran into ONLamp.com somewhere there. It seems to be a great resource for web development, using linux, apache, mysql, perl, php, python. I have been planning to look into php for some time. I heard that PHP Manual is the best online resource for it. But OnLamp seems to cover the other related technology areas too.
BTW, I am trying to migrate my bookmarks from IE to Opera. If someone knows an easy way, please drop me a note.